According to BitMEX Research, the Blocksize War was won so market participants do not need to police what goes on‑chain, beg peers not to relay transactions, or plead with miners about block contents, reaffirming a neutral relay and mining stance for Bitcoin (BTC). Source: BitMEX Research on X, Oct 1, 2025. For traders, this signals no advocated change to BTC transaction inclusion norms or mempool relay behavior, aligning execution assumptions with the existing feerate-driven fee market used by nodes and miners. Source: BitMEX Research on X, Oct 1, 2025; Bitcoin Core mempool and feerate policy documentation; BIP 125 Replace-By-Fee, 2016. This message focuses on network policy rather than price guidance, so near-term trading relevance centers on maintaining current assumptions for confirmation risk, fee budgeting, and settlement finality rather than protocol change risk. Source: BitMEX Research on X, Oct 1, 2025; Bitcoin Core policy documentation.

According to @BitMEXResearch, the current situation is looking increasingly like an attack on Bitcoin’s key censorship-resistance characteristics, as stated in its X post on Sep 25, 2025: https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1971332742718832834. The post explicitly directs readers to Adam Back’s related discussion for context, indicating an active debate among Bitcoin leaders on potential transaction-level censorship: https://x.com/adam3us/status/1971330468961542213. For traders, the source frames elevated censorship-risk concerns around BTC’s core utility, warranting close monitoring of the referenced discussion for updates that could inform positioning and risk management, per @BitMEXResearch’s alert: https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1971332742718832834.